JCT legally binding sustainability contracts?

To reinforce that we cannot address sustainability, carbon reduction and waste management from a hearts and minds, save the planet for future generations, common sense point of view and approach, JCT have started a consultation process as to which sustainability items should be made contractual within JCT forms of contract, as in legally binding commitments.

Details are on the JCT site

One of the consultation questions allows you to choose from a list of themes you would like seen as a contractual issue (see below), which gives a pretty good indication of what JCT is thinking.

Would the sustainability contract be with client and contractor, or all, as per the JCT Constructing Excellence Collaborative Contract (one would hope!).  Or following a growing school of thought that that the earth should have ‘legal status’, hence with the earth itself?

Which would you like to see as a contractual clause:

Carbon emissions associated with construction process
Carbon emissions associated with the end use of the ‘project’
Commercial vehicle movements
Consumption of energy during construction process
Consumption of energy associated with the end use of the ‘project’
Consumption of water during construction process
Consumption of water associated with the end use of the ‘project’
Economic sustainability in construction supply chain
Maintenance or optimisation of biodiversity
Origin of construction materials
Waste management in construction process
Waste management associated with the end use of the ‘project’
Advertisements
This entry was posted in built environment, collaborative working, comment, legislation, News, procurement, project management, sustainability. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to JCT legally binding sustainability contracts?

  1. fairsnape says:

    JCT working group update at http://www.jctltd.co.uk/stylesheet.asp?file=24042008144528

    Peter Hibberd, JCT secretary-general, summarised: On simple analysis, it is clear that sustainability is a matter of importance, and a substantial majority of respondents thought that performance could be improved through industry specific documentation.

    “Many thought that contract conditions should be specific about sustainability performance, but not too detailed, relying upon other supporting documentation for implementation.

    The general view was that these contract clauses must be legally enforceable, and 80 per cent thought that guidance was required for dealing with sustainability in contract documents.”

    Like

Please add your comments:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s