Author Archives: martin brown

North of England Innovation

Following on from our Best Practice Club Innovation event: I have received details of the North of England Excellence Innovation event on the 25th July at Haddock Park Racecourse

The circular states:

This promises to be a lively and stimulating event. Led by Paul Sloane of the BQF and Destination Innovation the evening will include a talk on Innovation and Leadership followed by some thought provoking and interactive group working. This will be aimed at showing delegates a number of creative problem solving techniques. Continue reading

Green Lessons for New Schools (BSF Update)

Mile Barter, communications at Lancs BSF, has sent in the following update:

Pupils from Burnley are using the building of their new school to learn about the environment – and to encourage action to stop global warming.  The 11 and 12-year-olds from Shuttleworth College, on Kiddrow Lane, have set up a sustainability project as part of their science learning.  They are researching the school’s carbon footprint and finding ways of reducing energy consumption Continue reading

unacceptable project management style?

Built to order

“my philosophy is to treat everybody in this industry as a crook, a cheat or a liar. Don’t trust anybody.”

This was the subheading for The Guardian’s Working Life article on Saturday.

Built to order profiled one of Banner Homes ‘specialist’ project managers, who wears a number one on his hard hat as “it winds some of them up”

It is a reminder that the shout and order, adversarial and aggressive approach to construction project management still exists. But in an environment of collaborative working, integrated working and building trust does this approach have a place in our industry today?

Even Banner Homes on their website do not think so, recognising on their customer care page

…that continued success comes not only from the expertise of the team itself, but from the importance it places on the relationships it has with contractors …

As a CE collaborative working champion and some one very much involved in the progress towards a collaborative, trust based sector, it saddens me to read articles like this.

I would urge readers of this to write to the Guardian (and even Banner Homes) pointing out the totally unrepresentative nature of this site manager, and lets hope the Guardian can balance this article with a profile that is representative of today’s progressive collaborative industry.

sustainable reposnses from ce

Noted on the CE (Constructing Excellence) web news pages (why is there no RSS feed here?) the responses that CE have made to the number of sustainability consultation documents around at the moment.   Of interest is the CE response to legislation on waste management plans.

(you may have to register to get access to these pages)

Free IT

Noted in the latest copy of insITe, the publication from the constructing excellence IT Construction Forum, that their membership scheme is now free. More details on registering on their website

civil sustainability

the recently launched civil engineering sustainability strategy can be downloaded from the CIRIA news site. (Can’t locate it on the ICE site which seems the obvious place!)

Well worth a read, I particularly like the aims:

Aim 1 Promote strong leadership for sustainable development within civil engineering There is a need for strong commitment and leadership at all levels, including clients, to tap into the enormous potential of civil engineering to protect the environment and promote sustainable development.

leadership is vital and it will interesting to watch how leaders in this sector become role models

But equally as interesting is Aim 3

Build capacity for sustainable development in civil engineering building capacity for sustainable development is about equipping organisations and individuals with the understanding, skills and access to independent information, knowledge and training that enables them to perform effectively.

It will again be interesting to see how this emerges, and whether an open source approach to knowledge share and education is adopted (open source sustainability)

I noted no mention of measuring the ecological (or carbon) footprint of civil engineering activities.

Sustainable development or jobs for the boys?

 Recent comments from the team at i-think – what do yu think?  Join the debate at  i-think

Sustainable development or jobs for the boys?

The Communities and Local Government department says the Government’s ‘Planning for a Sustainable Future: White Paper’ “proposes reforms on how we take decisions on nationally significant infrastructure projects – including energy, waste, waste-water and transport – responding to the challenges of economic globalisation and climate change. It also proposes further reforms to the Town and Country Planning system, building on the recent improvements to make it more efficient and more responsive.”

Friends of the Earth say that “sustainable development is being stripped apart to benefit big business. These proposals are bad for people, bad for democracy and bad for the environment … They will leave affected communities with no meaningful say in how their area is developed.”

What do you think? Click here to comment on i-Think.com.

Climate Change for the Masses

The plethora of recent events designed to tackle climate change culminated last week in Live Earth, Al Gore’s much publicised 24-hour, 7-continent concert series. With the aim of triggering a mass global movement in response to the climate change agenda, more than 100 musical acts were united in order to reach a worldwide audience of an estimated 2 billion people.

So do these essentially ‘consumer’ events help or hinder the cause? Live Earth has been criticised for being little more than a middle-of-the-road publicity stunt and, with many of the acts arriving via international air travel, could be seen as making a mockery of the entire underlying message.

And yet maybe that’s the point. Live Earth may not have had any measurable effect in terms of tackling global warming, but at least we all know what the point of the event was. As Environment Secretary Hilary Benn pointed out, “Events like Live Earth can help to bring people together to encourage them to take action locally, nationally, and internationally and with more than 40% of the UK’s carbon dioxide emissions coming from people’s homes and travel, inspiring people to act is increasingly urgent.”

Perhaps the message that we should take away from Live Earth is one of inclusiveness. Clearly business organisations need to play their part in reducing carbon emissions, but corporates should not be expected to shoulder the full weight of responsibility.

Research commissioned by DEFRA found that although 94% of British people think that the world’s climate is changing, only 66% say that they are personally taking action to limit this change. So what about the other 28%?

Using low energy lightbulbs, less of a reliance on air-conditioning and/or heating, switching off electrical appliances rather than merely leaving them on stand-by and a careful consideration of transport options are among the easiest changes that we can all make right across our every day lives.

Climate change is a big deal, but living and working sustainably, even at a personal level, need not be.

Log on to i-think to comment.

Carbon Footprint – definition – useful?

Recently published paper from ISA-UK Research & Consulting, based in Durham looks at the commonly used term of ‘Carbon Footprint’

definition of ‘carbon footprint’.

The term ‘carbon footprint’ has become very popular over the last few years and is now in widespread public use. With climate change high up on the political and corporate agenda, carbon footprint assessments are in strong demand.

The paper suggests the following definition, which may be useful in understanding the carbon footprint of  the construction process, the building or facility itself as well as  the facilities management aspects.

“The carbon footprint is a measure of the exclusive total amount of carbon dioxide emissions that is directly and indirectly caused by an activity or is accumulated over the life stages of a product.”

(my italics)

In any case, all direct (on-site, internal) and indirect emissions (off-site, external, embodied, upstream, downstream) need to be taken into account.

download the paper from ISA UK here

Waste and Civils Sustainability

Two of constructions leading institutes have, this week, released details of their approaches to sustainability .

On Monday the CIOB called for mandatory waste plans: from the CIOB news page

the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has called for all construction projects, involving more than 30 days or 500 person days of construction, to plan and implement a SWMP.

This would create a level playing field within the industry, encourage more efficient use of materials and reduce waste crime.

Michael Brown CIOB deputy chief executive commented, “As an industry we can’t just rely on construction companies with an ethical approach to the environment to take up the slack for those that show little concern for the use and misuse of our resources.

“We need a change of behaviour that requires everyone to reduce waste.  Without the appropriate regulation and teeth we fear that SWMPs will only be used by larger operators who have an interest in environmental issues.

And the ICE today launched the 2nd Civil Engineering Sustainable Development Strategy and Action Plan

Details should be on the ICE website soon (I guess.)

Construction Minister

Further to the recent post here, the effectiveness of the new Construction Minister is slowly being revealed:

From today’s Building web news:

In a newly-published list of ministerial responsibilities Timms, who is officially minister of state for competitiveness, will look after e-commerce, communications, information, bioscience, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, shipbuilding, automotive, manufacturing, creative industries, retail, steel and construction as part of his brief.

He is also responsible for enterprise, growth and business investment, regional economies, business support simplification, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility, as well as overseeing the Small Business Service, Companies House, the Shareholder Executive and the Industrial Development Unit.

Your views – here on on the Building website – always count